From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Angelo Graziosi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Still on f90 mode Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:49:41 +0100 Message-ID: <4B6DF205.4080206@alice.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265496641 27339 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2010 22:50:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:50:41 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 06 23:50:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NdtU4-0003UW-DG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:50:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35533 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NdtU3-00031p-Je for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:50:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NdtTy-00031j-DK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:50:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54173 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NdtTx-00031b-23 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:50:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NdtTw-0008Rh-7L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:50:28 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-out05a.alice.it ([85.33.3.5]:3107) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NdtTv-0008Ra-Rj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:50:28 -0500 Original-Received: from FBCMMO05.fbc.local ([7.168.68.254]) by smtp-OUT05A.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:50:25 +0100 Original-Received: from FBCMCL01B08.fbc.local ([192.168.171.46]) by FBCMMO05.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:49:56 +0100 Original-Received: from [82.57.173.128] ([82.57.173.128]) by FBCMCL01B08.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:49:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2010 22:49:56.0086 (UTC) FILETIME=[B3FC6160:01CAA77E] X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120997 Archived-At: When I re-indent the following code: interface foo [...] end interface foo (for example with the cursor on the last line, 'end interface...', and TAB; or selecting the interface block and TAB), the last line loses 'foo', the name of 'interface'. It becomes interface foo [...] end interface ! <-- after re-indentation This does not happen with 'program/end prog...', 'subroutine/end sub...', 'function/end func...', which, after re-indentation, *all* conserve the name in the 'end...' statement. Is that to be expected for 'interface'? Thanks, Angelo.