Re: Emacs 23 Mac port

["Jan D." <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>]

On 2010-01-12 22:22, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>>> Thanks.  But then a special event such as SIGUSR1 cancels an
>>>> incomplete key sequence being typed.  How about doing this only when
>>>> the current buffer is changed by the special event?
>>> IIRC the general approach to these kinds of problems in
>>> read-key-sequence is to only recompute the initial state if the current
>>> key-sequence is still empty.
>>> I.e. rather than check whether the special event has changed current
>>> buffer, we would instead check whether the keybuf is still empty.
>> But that can be wrong too.  In *scratch*:
>> C-c<drop .c-file>  C-e
>
> In which sense would it be wrong?  What would you consider to be "right"?
>
>

Well, given that we recompute only if the key-sequence is empty, the 
case above will then behave as the original bug.  I guess right would be 
to somehow detect that ketmaps need to be recomputed and do so without 
discarding any ongoing key sequence.

I'm just playing devils advocate here.  I don't think we can get it 100% 
correct easily.  Recompute on buffer change gets some border cases 
right, recompute on empty key-sequence gets some other border cases 
right.  But for the majority of cases, they are probably equivalent.

	Jan D.