From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: grischka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Case mapping of sharp s Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:33:23 +0100 Message-ID: <4B080843.7090507@gmx.de> References: <4B05A11F.5000700@gmx.de> <4B05D3EE.2000101@gmx.de> <4B0759BA.2010303@gmx.de> <83k4xkp84j.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258817650 20994 80.91.229.12 (21 Nov 2009 15:34:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@m17n.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 21 16:34:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NBryD-0004S4-N8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:33:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39314 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NBryD-0003YG-1t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:33:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NBry6-0003Xr-JT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:33:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NBry1-0003X2-36 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:33:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39189 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NBry0-0003Wr-TM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:33:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:58170) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NBry0-00005q-3A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:33:40 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2009 15:33:38 -0000 Original-Received: from p57A09E3E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.2]) [87.160.158.62] by mail.gmx.net (mp053) with SMTP; 21 Nov 2009 16:33:38 +0100 X-Authenticated: #18588216 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/YMQxm2UHYqaZl/3a+7gvro8R+K+Bxo2+w8WXzIM fVtiE3soQO0VSm User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) In-Reply-To: <83k4xkp84j.fsf@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.79 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117447 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Or maybe > this particular use-case does not benefit from the cache, and we > should have a no-cache method for doing the same. In particular this use-case not only does not benefit from that cache but severely suffers from a bug in there, that is for calls with adjacent descending (probably also ascending) positions in a row. --- grischka