From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIERqw6Rydg==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Failure in building CVS Emacs [xsettings] and other Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:12:49 +0100 Message-ID: <4B02F5B1.3080401@swipnet.se> References: <4B028A84.30704@alice.it> <4B02AABC.9090502@swipnet.se> <4B02DF8C.3000906@alice.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258485238 6247 80.91.229.12 (17 Nov 2009 19:13:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs To: Angelo Graziosi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 17 20:13:51 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NATUr-000446-Ni for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:13:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37025 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NATUr-0005az-5z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:13:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NATU7-0005FI-4X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NATU2-0005DH-P0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59718 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NATU2-0005DC-Ch for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:12:58 -0500 Original-Received: from proxy3.bredband.net ([195.54.101.73]:56488) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NATU2-000410-0p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:12:58 -0500 Original-Received: from ipb2.telenor.se (195.54.127.165) by proxy3.bredband.net (7.3.140.3) id 4AD3E1BA00FBFC5F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:12:57 +0100 X-SMTPAUTH-B2: X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtGeAIuEAktV4S1uPGdsb2JhbACBSoMalEyCZAEBAQE3qiWRF4EwgjdUBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,759,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="4593673" Original-Received: from c-6e2de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.110]) by ipb2.telenor.se with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2009 20:12:56 +0100 Original-Received: from anon-62-148.ipredate.net (anon-62-148.ipredate.net [93.182.148.62]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 494407FA07B; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:12:53 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090915 Thunderbird/3.0b4 In-Reply-To: <4B02DF8C.3000906@alice.it> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117119 Archived-At: Angelo Graziosi skrev 2009-11-17 18.38: > Jan Dj=C3=A4rv ha scritto: >> Angelo Graziosi skrev: >> >>> >>> Instead, it builds on Kubuntu 9.10, but the result does not look very >>> good, in my opinion. I have attached the screen shots regarding a >>> previous build (on 20091114, without xsettings, I think), called >>> 'good', and the current, called 'bad': my opinion is that this has >>> characters too light. >>> >> >> It doesn't really say anything unless you compare it with some other >> application with the same font. > > Obviously, I have compared on the same system: Kubuntu-9.10, i.e. with > same font! only the source of Emacs changed! between 20091114 and > 20091117. Indeed reinstalling the previous build, 20091114, it looks > better than current 20091117. > > The build I did on 20091114 looks like other KDE applications using the > same font (Konsole, for example). > > On Kubuntu-8.04.3 the build of 20091117 fails as described, so I cannot > compare anything. > You forgot to answer my questions. I can't do anything until you do. Al= so,=20 what font did you use? Jan D.