From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: hans bennekop Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4374: find-file-at-point doesn't recognize absolute file paths with trailing line numbers. (Patch included.) Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:24:20 +0200 Message-ID: <4AA74A14.2000205@gmail.com> Reply-To: hans bennekop , 4374@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1252483412 8248 80.91.229.12 (9 Sep 2009 08:03:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: juri@jurta.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 09 10:03:25 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MlI9D-0000gv-T7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:03:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35680 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlI9D-0007mY-E1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:03:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlGxQ-0003kC-LW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:47:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlGxK-0003j0-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54758 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlGxK-0003ik-GS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:52898) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlGxJ-0008Ec-C7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:47:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n896kwQo021404; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 23:46:59 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n896U4JK018697; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 23:30:04 -0700 Resent-Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 23:30:04 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: hans bennekop Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:30:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4374 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125247749517857 (code B ref -1); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:30:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Sep 2009 06:24:55 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n896OrLB017845 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 23:24:54 -0700 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlGbp-0002RE-KE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:24:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlGbk-0002Fx-8r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:24:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41675 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlGbj-0002FU-Fw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:24:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f220.google.com ([209.85.218.220]:63926) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlGbi-0005D7-Ns for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:24:42 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so1130870bwz.42 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:24:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eWMrCooDfkA9FoZGkIHMB2OAcrye37N3FAzCj/zIuWQ=; b=E4CebbGEf7LLjMQpN4HWsh2P2gPk9mBt2n8wCqtBrTqGTMC501v9JL7aZtmKnHjEEV znM83fon6RUOEdWPY+8aPUYLK/E8+aoGvyyeKt2ryIVsvWn+4R9lCo3YhH/VFRANMRAv L2p+0ms+0P4f/zfXFEt+wdQucHdE8RWDxACPM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Oyapz/VSN7H6Zf2Wbg49aRYPFzQ0zV1sUnFUOHWWjFV6VzYLn2ac9mEvMjepnlJ3E7 93xikF7+n4XIZQDwIrisfnvgFnx+LE2ZuRlZFZQIE03DQXF5LgfUAXw4Pa/rAXvrHBn3 jL/OnHiye6IW6slT9A4VG4ZR1klDIIY+Rc3bA= Original-Received: by 10.223.21.153 with SMTP id j25mr6894385fab.79.1252477481477; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?192.168.1.25? (dslb-088-068-199-074.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.68.199.74]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 1sm1187439fkt.51.2009.09.08.23.24.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:24:40 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) Original-References: 87my546fma.fsf@mail.jurta.org X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:47:07 -0400 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:02:53 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:30881 Archived-At: > I wonder what the value of `path-separator' do you have? Is it a colon? Oh, I didn't see that part. It's a semicolon (Windows). Since I don't know of any relevant OS where colons are permitted in a path, I'd vote for explicitly handling them to allow for compatibility with Unix style paths.