From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Elusive assertion failure related to completion Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:00:13 +0200 Message-ID: <4A9CF0AD.2090202@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251799315 30349 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2009 10:01:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:01:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 01 12:01:47 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MiQBO-0004lW-Qj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:01:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53655 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MiQBO-0007Kw-2n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:01:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MiQA9-0006Lb-GV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:00:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MiQA4-0006Hl-Lt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:00:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36208 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MiQA4-0006HS-E5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:00:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:44698) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MiQA3-00034O-P8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 06:00:24 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Sep 2009 10:00:19 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-54-169.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.54.169]) [62.47.54.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp055) with SMTP; 01 Sep 2009 12:00:19 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18kMLk5bsoksL/wWkYIet3FZcVX7CT5n9Xmf7NpWR i+kLbrBt9McZrG User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.66 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114940 Archived-At: > I've been trying to debug it, but the backtraces are not always > identical. One sample follows. Does the following part show up in all backtraces? > [Switching to thread 1 (thread 3668.0x2f0)]#0 delete_all_subwindows > (w=0x33c0a00) at window.c:6314 > 6314 w->total_lines = w->buffer; /* See > Fset_window_configuration for excuse. */ If so, does the bug trigger the same way when you replace that w->total_lines = w->buffer; /* See Fset_window_configuration for excuse. */ line by something like if (BUFFERP (w->buffer)) w->total_lines = w->buffer; /* See Fset_window_configuration for excuse. */ which is just a wild guess, though. martin