From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: buildobj.lst and Windows builds - a tiny bit of help needed? Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:42:43 +0800 Message-ID: <4A917183.9090404@gnu.org> References: <4CC1CF5E-088F-459E-BCF7-61DEFA747DE1@raeburn.org> <4A90FE29.9080205@gnu.org> <72B7514B-A488-4FA1-A0C6-8114E60E9209@raeburn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251045938 31104 80.91.229.12 (23 Aug 2009 16:45:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Developers To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 23 18:45:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MfGC5-0000XX-Qf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:45:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41168 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MfGC3-0007GX-B1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfGAM-0005Xr-Ov for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:43:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfGAL-0005VS-C6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:43:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51296 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MfGAL-0005VD-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:43:37 -0400 Original-Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.149]:54527) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MfGAK-0004oi-DY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:43:36 -0400 Original-Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so533816eyb.24 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:43:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fuxJfHiDHFlJswhZBBs2HQvKhpxMwl2dyUfpBfUZduU=; b=El/UkY7wmWH3L/zh9HrCzoXX7wXoaAo/jZ4SiDWGbOAsPSkW3pdd/uTHTuBL38Nnv6 ufsfKkjQOaDbcq2QNL3SowPf27W9s3Bq0hvEa2NrvvwmPqrFPQld52zaKUggRSeFHM3i +LidHgg9yb5vQyXqVtXVVsSaBMLSErTKf6jxs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=miKBJEeHt03AmTKf3RUZ2cNpiid+hW/lUF2GCDjeD0BY4TTE0jcAmaUotSj2QhddwJ qHc+NB9+tA/Qy4WpewSfrYNe8g5keVM9JUdjKS9kCFqM7jJ5nH/XIAtipLUsJlT2A1CZ 7EeeEF1fnDbJFVTZj2TOg/uZ4by8joBLuJikY= Original-Received: by 10.210.88.6 with SMTP id l6mr186541ebb.26.1251045815136; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?10.1.0.178? ([89.206.134.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm8817437eyz.11.2009.08.23.09.43.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:43:33 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) In-Reply-To: <72B7514B-A488-4FA1-A0C6-8114E60E9209@raeburn.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114533 Archived-At: Ken Raeburn wrote: > > echo $(ARGQUOTE)#define BUILDOBJ $(DQUOTE)\$(ARGQUOTE) > > $(SRC)/buildobj.h > echo $(OBJ0) $(ARGQUOTE)\$(ARGQUOTE) >> $(SRC)/buildobj.h Yes, that looks about right. > Is one backslash what I need here, if I want to get one written to the > file at the end of the line? Or does some backslash quote processing > happen, and I need two? If you don't need to double the backslashes in the main Makefile.in, then I don't think it will be necessary here. If you do need to double them in Makefile.in, then it is probably dependent on the shell in use, and we'll have to add some more definitions to correctly cope with the differences.