From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: moving window handling into lisp Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:25:12 +0200 Message-ID: <4A87DE88.6050209@gmx.at> References: <4A868A1F.4020101@gmx.at> <4A86AD92.7030308@gmx.at> <87vdkpfbeg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <4A86DE30.8060902@gmx.at> <4A86F24D.4090103@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250418696 27871 80.91.229.12 (16 Aug 2009 10:31:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 16 12:31:29 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mcd1L-0007gq-Sm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:31:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45430 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mcd1L-0005Rc-51 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 06:31:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MccvV-0002HQ-SF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 06:25:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MccvP-0002GS-D2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 06:25:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53129 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MccvO-0002G0-GU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 06:25:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:57230) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MccvN-0006xL-SN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 06:25:18 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2009 10:25:14 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-43-46.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.43.46]) [62.47.43.46] by mail.gmx.net (mp052) with SMTP; 16 Aug 2009 12:25:14 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/jJTMmcdfjyTcL273iAxtU6XchnhhnbxmQoNMdR4 yT3n91p4/xp9o4 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.75 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114294 Archived-At: > However in that case I would still suggest showing one window > temporary and explain and give alternatives there. I can't see that it > is worse than just deleting the windows. Just deleting the windows > might look like a bug - or maybe just not be noticed, be confusing. It hardly was a problem recently. What's more important IMHO is that when we shrink a frame and re-enlarge it afterwards we should get the previous sizes. That's, however, more difficult to do. martin