From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: point-min and 1 Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:50:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4A85336E.5070507@gmx.at> References: <83vdkvjbet.fsf@gnu.org> <4A813774.1030309@gmx.at> <83tz0ejjm8.fsf@gnu.org> <4A82839E.2010409@gmx.at> <83ljlpj5im.fsf@gnu.org> <4A83E27B.1030802@gmx.at> <4A84568F.7040706@gmx.at> <87ocqjv0dw.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4A850F3A.3010005@gmx.at> <87hbwakajo.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250243602 26883 80.91.229.12 (14 Aug 2009 09:53:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 14 11:53:15 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MbtTG-00068z-3E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:53:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56775 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MbtTF-0000qA-FJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:53:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbtQv-00081y-9C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:50:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbtQq-0007zN-4w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:50:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42617 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MbtQp-0007z5-Rj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:50:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:58002) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MbtQp-0007LP-2C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:50:43 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2009 09:50:40 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-41-235.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.41.235]) [62.47.41.235] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 14 Aug 2009 11:50:40 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+nPjkQD8anRtl/yTl3CkMi8/VXYeuGftxuNBG+BS /9jWDqwVWAvhpr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <87hbwakajo.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.79 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114233 Archived-At: > That's exactly why you don't have a point. Every second use of "think" > is within the idiom "I think", and yet we don't use a separate word for > it. Because we don't need a separate word for a common simple idiom > comprised of elementary parts. If every second use of "think" were within the idiom "I, David Kastrup, think" we probably would have a spearate word for it ... martin