From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: moving window handling into lisp Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:52:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4A6DDB61.8090403@gmx.at> References: <4A6DAD94.8040006@gmx.at> <4A6DAF71.6070002@gmx.at> <4A6DBB3A.90001@gmx.at> <4A6DC1A1.2000208@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248715006 6338 80.91.229.12 (27 Jul 2009 17:16:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Miles Bader , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 27 19:16:38 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MVToM-0007mT-Ty for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:16:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36174 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVToM-0002dK-74 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:16:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVTRZ-00023Y-R2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:52:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVTRV-00021B-7o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:52:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35346 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVTRV-000213-2i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:52:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:50707) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVTRU-000546-9H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:52:52 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2009 16:52:50 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-46-195.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.46.195]) [62.47.46.195] by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 18:52:50 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+moqMWKTymElHKaHZARWBnetooxI4/NpG3ET8GEm rHGKeJ8fZ4FiE4 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.75 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113231 Archived-At: > What I mean is that maybe you have more freedom there when you do this > internally. Can't you for example calculate the sizes going down the > tree before actually applying them to the windows? Can't you this way > calculate all the sizes before applying them? You may then of course > have to store them node by node by node, but there will be no > surprises when you apply them, or? I don't know, I would have to code that first. But I wonder why this didn't occur to you and Stefan when you wrote your window balancing routines. You both ended up using `adjust-window-trailing-edge' ;-) martin