Re: select-active-regions

[David De La Harpe Golden <david@harpegolden.net>]

David De La Harpe Golden wrote:

> Apologies.  Chong Yidong had already had to point out to me that it 
> broke w32, but w32 was already internally faking a primary:
> In general, enabling select-active-regions at all on platforms that 
> don't have a true primary selection may not make an immense amount of 
> sense, but if they're internally emulating as w32 was it does make some 
> sense.
> 

argh. every instance of w32 above should read "w32 emacs" for clarity.

"
Apologies.  Chong Yidong had already had to point out to me that it
broke w32 emacs, but w32 emacs was already internally faking a primary:

In general, enabling select-active-regions at all on platforms that
don't have a true primary selection may not make an immense amount of
sense, but if they're internally emulating as w32 emacs was it does make 
some sense.
"