From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sending attachments Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:17:00 +0800 Message-ID: <4A57070C.6030908@gnu.org> References: <87k52rzyn1.fsf@benthic.rattlesnake.com> <873a9fw6dt.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87y6r7yp1y.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ljn1dcc4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4A5485D0.5060808@gnu.org> <87d48b9trl.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <871vor45w8.fsf@iki.fi> <87y6qz8d1y.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87eispzixw.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1247218403 27956 80.91.229.12 (10 Jul 2009 09:33:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Reiner Steib , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 10 11:33:16 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MPCTi-000635-8D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:33:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40305 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPCTh-0000hV-EV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:33:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPCEw-0002jR-Gz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:17:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPCEq-0002hZ-4o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:17:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60247 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPCEp-0002hW-S7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:17:51 -0400 Original-Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.168]:60033) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MPCEm-0005v4-Vs; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:17:49 -0400 Original-Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so228562wfg.24 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:17:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vkEI4864c0alKAKaYvxtQU12AtXYV8ew9xBKia/5IcI=; b=BGQ60pFH6gZtRaU8lNUwnkQCWlPEses06w6uiprIIcuiHhIXZNjwQpOAnGh/TLAXOn bqBtaoFAFjeU0Qvq4CDEf8hzTwt/KXHTBX150mmvf3IVXpaENrRec+Z1EtVt/nX8ZHPC sqZaU7v2BPCryxWDo+nQM4DPIbHdu6l+2OLUg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ChIqS4hbAZKGz7tZnhLchHAJ+9cUuXgzEiNdQ7FKaZ9xtksJpDIrIuTf5uu6yr2POe zKZlSKgFKgDp9HdoutbUGR0U7dHza/3EKylEmHEwi806pLdJXiUkBkpK4VcEzykfmEA9 Dv9Dqi1h5ZTUShkgKJN4KUVTFMTEtxbTCDAkg= Original-Received: by 10.143.3.4 with SMTP id f4mr546276wfi.62.1247217467514; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?192.168.249.26? ([124.13.7.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm1758034wfg.25.2009.07.10.02.17.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:17:46 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112290 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > But in practice, since the readers decide heuristically > whether to display inline, users mostly have no reason > to go out of their way to offer a recommendation. > It is better normally not to ask. > A good interface might be to normally only prompt for the filename, but if a prefix argument is given then prompt for disposition, content-type and description also. Then users would have a simple interface, but can still access the full functionality if they want.