From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why the `click' modifier for a mouse-wheel event? Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:27:58 +0800 Message-ID: <4A516F3E.6060603@gnu.org> References: <87d48q94gf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1246850936 25430 80.91.229.12 (6 Jul 2009 03:28:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 03:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 06 05:28:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MNesq-0006K0-1O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 05:28:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53958 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MNesp-0001xo-Fv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:28:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MNesl-0001ve-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:28:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MNesg-0001kJ-Op for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:28:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48075 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MNesg-0001jx-Ir for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:28:38 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.251]:38412) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MNesg-00040f-68 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:28:38 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so1264789rvb.6 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:28:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hs6S7SlW1xiIz5Bk/PQ5i6ZDL3coZkFuUYZTOVn88o0=; b=wDppheJKu1pXZxrgeHfueIeFTW6+NzHc3kPFQnV6/zm5aBAG6Ds8GJK/mZnicuC3TV sMrbQGhoX61SoUKkCovFo6LnbSIBRmcSKTEkoi2aUaxJqWfcH7BQXf3e3HM6AcNjDDa0 l9XZC/LkeTplgOgjaBVY6OjovC+ci9bSi+0WE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wcuM4nnE3PhysVYlXpkA2kb1uZkqmsBKr2syDh4FRgnsYbcaSIGyp5JMOsfk05jSGF U1fFrWAJ92mfjBim87P5GIkKZzyvAOPDlacS47AmqPHXHOb2yUnoftKKCnXi1mV8ngwC pBfvvHrvUMIdpPZIb7fCZ0hqEKhojyNyLzGLc= Original-Received: by 10.141.37.8 with SMTP id p8mr2051208rvj.60.1246850916595; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?10.1.1.112? ([61.4.103.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l31sm26460769rvb.43.2009.07.05.20.28.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:28:35 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) In-Reply-To: <87d48q94gf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112062 Archived-At: Chong Yidong wrote: > "Drew Adams" writes: > > >> Subject line says it all. >> >> In Emacs 22 (and 21, 20...), using the mouse wheel did not add any modifiers to >> the event that was read. In Emacs 23, `event-modifiers' for a >> `mouse-wheel-down-event' or `mouse-wheel-up-event' returns `(click)'. >> > > I think this change was made to make Windows behave like the other > ports. IIRC, this was in response to a bug report by Lennart (?), but I > can't find it in the tracker right now. > It was bug#687, about wheel events triggering mouse-avoidance, since they were not considered as mouse events.