From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Barton Subject: Re: Item ranking system? Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:16:10 +0100 Message-ID: <4A4E4AEA.70702@manor-farm.org> References: <87my7lod79.fsf@rosslaird.info> Reply-To: lists@manor-farm.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MMnJ4-0006eF-B8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:16:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MMnJ1-0006e3-Lu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:16:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36326 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MMnJ1-0006e0-G0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:16:15 -0400 Received: from li40-130.members.linode.com ([72.14.178.130]:43614) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MMnJ1-0002vl-4S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:16:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (mail.wilkesley.org [127.0.0.1]) by li40-130.members.linode.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F601CB85 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 19:16:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from li40-130.members.linode.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wilkesley.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L7oLWU5O9YGS for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 19:16:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.55] (unknown [217.146.125.41]) by li40-130.members.linode.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FE9FCB7B for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2009 19:16:12 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87my7lod79.fsf@rosslaird.info> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Ross A. Laird wrote: > I'm sure there are many ways in org to accomplish my goal with this > particular project, which is to create a ranking system for items. > Here's the situation: I have about 200 items that I am evaluating. I > need each item to have a title, a tag, a note, and a ranking from 0 to > 5. Then, I need to be able to sort the items by rank, with items ranked > 5 at the top. I know that I can do this using tables in org, but I > prefer the flexibility of headings (some of the items might have long > notes attached to them, or links, or whatever). Also, I don't think I > can tag individual cells in a table, or operate on cells the way I can > with headings in org (move, refile, show and hide, etc.). So, I'm > looking for something that will allow me to have the best of worlds: > flexibility as with headings, and numerical sorting as with table cells. > > Suggestions most welcome. > What about making them all TODO items and using the priority filed for sorting. I don't use priorities myself, so I am not sure if you can change A, B, C, etc to 1, 2, 3. Ian.