From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: please make line-move-visual nil Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 21:54:40 +0800 Message-ID: <4A1BF4A0.3000609@gnu.org> References: <48914.130.55.118.19.1242592120.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <66C6BA04EBCF4B6DAED69E851627D852@us.oracle.com> <54A5E41E3FD446F590AA580D90C5B518@us.oracle.com> <56DF3F5FED9445EAB0C666DE0904BAC2@us.oracle.com> <87fxes5p4n.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <7b501d5c0905260437l2a14fd21nd319f4eeb4e3d972@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1243346130 22007 80.91.229.12 (26 May 2009 13:55:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , Drew Adams , Deniz Dogan To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 26 15:55:22 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M8x7i-00049k-GF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 15:55:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56140 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M8x7h-0004zi-QE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 09:55:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M8x7d-0004zT-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 09:55:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M8x7Y-0004zH-MG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 09:55:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43599 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M8x7Y-0004zE-J4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 09:55:12 -0400 Original-Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.171]:29281) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M8x7Y-0002Nu-28 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 09:55:12 -0400 Original-Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so1166994wfg.24 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 06:55:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MX5YUOGIuzPhfDdOfDJj/c7VjVHIKJGGzv/LNQHaF5k=; b=Ax1e2v3Eehvf9ELnZXtcjGZGYFDX/9/d3WvfW2/2/KPNImT6MUDRxmkGkyuLWF/TPP TTgy/7aRJgCk3jFaYQXvU3BTZIyNohAqqj6W4ZREYkIMuLwVxqepFFTItArjdkqukhiE cet9N9kHHjC8Y//Xdr/g5pOoxMRPGPtC/QBKY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ka+CZwny24c9SN/TEAqbJb5YHjp67EUYFsoQ3OZnQ2/YchMFgluJvPfDaKMCnHIDkN DrIFZIyrH3Rt8NUd42+5HGkQ6ldF7w2hveNGTNcZhW5Ea2nsBqwOMkCAUBFni5u+t2bV NsmgsxYlfJTX5pX07dOgZp0huY+thJ5iRACgU= Original-Received: by 10.142.231.7 with SMTP id d7mr2694096wfh.124.1243346110411; Tue, 26 May 2009 06:55:10 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?192.168.249.26? ([124.13.7.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm5163596wfd.19.2009.05.26.06.55.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 26 May 2009 06:55:10 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:111114 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman wrote: > I believe it might be better to investigate more how certain features > (like visual-line-move) should be handled under different > circumstances. Such circumstances is (as is pointed out here) macros, > but there are others two, like printing. line-movement is not involved in printing. But any non-interactive use probably falls into the same category as macros.