From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: grischka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: I can see invisible characters Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:02:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4A159744.5030105@gmx.de> References: <4A146CE3.6060306@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1242928990 27668 80.91.229.12 (21 May 2009 18:03:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 18:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 21 20:03:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M7Cbe-0004Gv-H1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 May 2009 20:03:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48407 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M7Cbe-0001IQ-4f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 May 2009 14:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M7CbY-0001IL-3Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2009 14:02:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M7CbT-0001I6-CD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2009 14:02:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60173 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M7CbT-0001I3-9t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2009 14:02:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:55225) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M7CbS-0001fU-FX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2009 14:02:50 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 May 2009 18:02:46 -0000 Original-Received: from p57A080F7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.4]) [87.160.128.247] by mail.gmx.net (mp070) with SMTP; 21 May 2009 20:02:46 +0200 X-Authenticated: #18588216 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+NDMhWXYSNwNbGJDg9tPC+kd4mT2wOSDLnHD/2rs NmPuzSkeTRI+My User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.76 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:111016 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> In your case, the property is not front-sticky, so point can be at >>> beginning of the intangible span, i.e. at BOB. >> But note that even both "front sticky" and "intangible" set on >> the topmost area don't prevent point from going to BOB. > > If the span is rear-sticky as well, that's perfectly normal, I think. > If the span is rear-nonsticky, I guess this may also be the case and > would then be a BOB exception. I'm pretty sure that front-sticky intangible doesn't work right. And that not only in the exceptional but also in the normal case. --- grischka