From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26959: Feature request: bold underlines Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 07:04:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49a934d2-fd0b-4b5d-bd77-379d0d3f95fc@default> References: <76ec819b-3daa-43c5-bc91-7a3f0a86b857@default> <2e85019c-a970-dfcb-9c33-233c39fc59b4@live.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495029924 8981 195.159.176.226 (17 May 2017 14:05:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 14:05:24 +0000 (UTC) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel , 26959@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 17 16:05:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAzZi-00028S-RN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 16:05:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49141 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAzZo-0005QU-AE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 10:05:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37449) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAzZc-0005N2-HD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 10:05:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAzZW-00043B-Rr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 10:05:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48294) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAzZW-000437-PJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 10:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAzZW-0006Da-EB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 10:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 14:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26959 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26959-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26959.149502989623885 (code B ref 26959); Wed, 17 May 2017 14:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26959) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2017 14:04:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50971 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAzZQ-0006DB-54 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 10:04:56 -0400 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:38881) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAzZN-0006Cv-Vh for 26959@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 10:04:54 -0400 Original-Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id v4HE4ljr022246 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 17 May 2017 14:04:47 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v4HE4k81029634 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 17 May 2017 14:04:46 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0007.oracle.com (abhmp0007.oracle.com [141.146.116.13]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v4HE4hXK028426; Wed, 17 May 2017 14:04:44 GMT In-Reply-To: <2e85019c-a970-dfcb-9c33-233c39fc59b4@live.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 12.0.6767.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132566 Archived-At: > > See my reply to bug #26958. Should we have two requests: > > 1. Wavy (and plain) underline to follow text scaling (#26958). > > 2. Be able to configure underline line-width (#26959). >=20 > Yes, that's a great summary. >=20 > > Is #2 enough? If we could customize the :line-width for :underline > > (and :overline? and :strike-through?), would that be sufficient, or > > is there also a need for such lines to be sensitive to text scaling? >=20 > I don't think so =E2=80=94 sensitivity to text scaling would be a useful,= distinct > feature. Otherwise Lisp code will have to inspect font sizes and adjust > thickness based on it, which will cause inconsistencies. Additionally, t= he > amount of space between the text and the underline needs to be adjusted w= hen > the font size changes =E2=80=94 and this is currently done on GNU/Linux a= lready. Whatever decision is made about what the most appropriate behavior is, should we make it optional, e.g., give users a way to _not_ scale such lines, boxes, etc.?