From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vinicius Jose Latorre Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2374: 23.0.60; Printing doesn't use face Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:56:50 -0300 Message-ID: <49F65452.9070807@ig.com.br> References: <873aebxqqs.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <49F4EA87.2050302@ig.com.br> <09C6ED6B-8407-445A-8DAF-87F68FEE1F9E@boostpro.com> Reply-To: Vinicius Jose Latorre , 2374@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1240881135 13649 80.91.229.12 (28 Apr 2009 01:12:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , 2374@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: David Abrahams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 28 03:12:05 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lybrg-0005gA-MJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:12:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41900 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lybrf-0005IE-MD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lybrb-0005Fh-CO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:11:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LybrV-000597-Ox for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:11:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45701 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LybrV-00058y-JN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:11:53 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:47969) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LybrV-0006jv-4c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:11:53 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3S1BpJE007473; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:11:51 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n3S103Sx003168; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:00:03 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Vinicius Jose Latorre Original-Sender: Vinicius =?UTF-8?Q?Jos=C3=A9?= Latorre Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2374 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2374-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2374.12408798911875 (code B ref 2374); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:00:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2374) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Apr 2009 00:51:31 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f110.google.com (mail-qy0-f110.google.com [209.85.221.110]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3S0pSXM001869 for <2374@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:51:29 -0700 Original-Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so528964qyk.19 for <2374@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:51:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c4oGLxsIsRWkQ06j++DkBlT+mgtzDI4XJsp05h05pVs=; b=v793TpJjO9LKTwX3NsGT2akhwdCTyfQAgmy0idRuZgw9ZtklrkWNk2LFGFbgCWIjO0 fjgGJWGZyiLMU9hN7gCfDUKYKcPO6dwLv84zO3F0mvqCa56di0T+YnrVjnTa4CyFmh5Q V8SOY8hZockJImQAy6xXdc2bZ1B7wQEpStZac= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=yIbLgZKjZGnbLIISVb5D1k4InchAAwfkE/6FuFwEHCvProzAc/9UEMGcfOBBAPLBQr +/rsv1/fNiDdyBu2q/SHZ062g3fDxoN/od9G86edOE5lHjSjO1tPVHQrVeVA/TQ5ueyj 9UXo98PhrcnRxnB6VSdS9VlfiQBoCJFTtEpRM= Original-Received: by 10.224.11.72 with SMTP id s8mr7025008qas.138.1240879882807; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:51:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?192.168.0.101? ([201.82.135.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm724195ywd.25.2009.04.27.17.51.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:51:22 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090402 SeaMonkey/1.1.16 In-Reply-To: <09C6ED6B-8407-445A-8DAF-87F68FEE1F9E@boostpro.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:11:57 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:27485 Archived-At: David Abrahams wrote: > > On Apr 26, 2009, at 7:13 PM, Vinicius Jose Latorre wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> >> Sorry for the very long delay, I'm very short in time these days. >> >> Well, printing package uses ps-print package to generate a PostScript >> file to be printed. >> >> And ps-print does not deal with all face attributes. At present >> moment only the following face attributes are used by ps-print: bold, >> italic, underline, background color and foreground color. >> >> The variable ps-font-family specifies the font used by all ordinary >> text to be generated. The default is 'Courier. >> >> When ps-print was created (1993), there weren't face attributes like >> font family, width and height. >> >> So, I don't think this is a bug, but a missing feature. > > > Great; thanks. So could you consider my report a feature request? Yes, for sure.