From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: request: make-frame-visible hook Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:10:52 +0100 Message-ID: <49A00B6C.2040206@gmx.at> References: <87zlgjis69.fsf@earthlink.net> <87vdr7i5cc.fsf@earthlink.net> <87ljs199so.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <877i3ky1wn.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235225898 25209 80.91.229.12 (21 Feb 2009 14:18:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 21 15:19:34 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LashU-0000lf-6e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:19:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57141 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lasg9-0002i1-OF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:18:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lasbs-0006oJ-LB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:13:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lasbq-0006nk-6g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:13:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40911 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lasbp-0006nI-In for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:13:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:54983) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lasbp-0004FY-1x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:13:37 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2009 14:13:35 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-54-116.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.54.116]) [62.47.54.116] by mail.gmx.net (mp048) with SMTP; 21 Feb 2009 15:13:35 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19aAbV2erJaoWXAxIgkhebvQFA6d/rBI6wQCZd5fE /GefJbdp3HWlhm User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.8 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109275 Archived-At: > Of course, this depends on what is put into post-command-hook. For > example, doing spell-check there, which involves interaction with a > subprocess, _does_ give you a performance hit that is quite > noticeable. That's why on-the-fly spell-checking has to be done with a timer. Even the people who wrote Microsoft Word knew that ... martin