From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail?? Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:22:08 +0800 Message-ID: <49853F90.7070608@gnu.org> References: <20090131104403.GQ4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20090131211929.GT4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20090131222401.GU4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233469482 12360 80.91.229.12 (1 Feb 2009 06:24:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:24:42 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 01 07:25:56 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LTVmG-00029k-6N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:25:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49341 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTVkx-0006pB-Ei for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:24:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTVjF-0006QO-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:22:49 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTVjD-0006Or-7J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:22:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36499 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTVjC-0006Ob-Ti for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:22:46 -0500 Original-Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.185]:10564) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LTVjC-0001X5-F9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:22:46 -0500 Original-Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id u5so391570tia.10 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:22:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=goNOAfXjNUD87dfbBlRx32RZ4KvWtYzltb+G4ofsGR4=; b=tvCUPE9miV99s3AnE+MbUn4kHZVszNOAY+3KDD/TxuW8jx0UkbgtJ+wyg0++SMTgPD AJYzRj60Uj/YFa4UfIlDmtD+WUaOjrF6bF6ZY9MA1CnyUiUS1HhJ+B5VU+yK1Nw+KzkU 41ZuOshJ8JWQsd2K5Ttk6wz2jY32WABpZ4yRI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lD2/1/bUQIQawzsgypV5OQW+soWMVl3zlVibGiAUsc750w+wvu7Wast80qxKEE5arB ktHZXsVp3+62JbXTSRtnAD2rmWVWZz0YWT/PeIezuWAUmb55iCEyxi3W0cd6eldC03JD TxYAAKJgXcE+/mIJy3j3jQ42yLvDIJd57jcY8= Original-Received: by 10.110.33.15 with SMTP id g15mr4030048tig.30.1233469364290; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:22:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?116.48.177.105? (n11648177105.netvigator.com [116.48.177.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a14sm5799365tia.32.2009.01.31.22.22.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:22:43 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) In-Reply-To: <20090131222401.GU4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108496 Archived-At: Don Armstrong wrote: >> Rmail's maintainer is "FSF". Which means that Emacs maintainers are >> collectively responsible for maintaining Rmail. >> > > Doesn't really matter to me who is responsible for it; I just need a > mailing address. > For other sub-packages that come under the umbrella of the emacs developers, we have assigned bugs to "emacs,PACKAGE", so that the sub-package can be used as a filter in the web interface, but the emacs maintainers continue to be kept in the loop. > It is actually what is meant. If a package doesn't exist, people > shouldn't file bugs against it. People don't file bugs against those packages, since the only address for filing bugs is for emacs. But they might get reassigned later.