From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Davis Herring" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC and bzr. Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49696.130.55.132.38.1272226688.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> References: <4BCF45FA.1060808@swipnet.se> <4BD0395F.7040500@swipnet.se> <87eii7629z.fsf@telefonica.net> <87aasv5zsz.fsf@telefonica.net> <87633j5ya8.fsf@telefonica.net> <871ve75t1e.fsf@telefonica.net> <83633j48mi.fsf@gnu.org> <87sk6n4733.fsf@telefonica.net> <87hbn33zd2.fsf@telefonica.net> <87d3xq52u6.fsf@telefonica.net> <83zl0u3726.fsf@gnu.org> <878w8e44by.fsf@telefonica.net> <83d3xq2nb0.fsf@gnu.org> <58472.130.55.118.19.1272041644.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> Reply-To: herring@lanl.gov NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272226708 32585 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2010 20:18:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar_Fuentes?= , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Dan Nicolaescu" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 25 22:18:25 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O68HZ-0003Lg-6g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:18:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53669 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O68HY-0002Dl-Gn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:18:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O68HT-0002DT-9c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:18:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49691 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O68HR-0002CV-Mf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:18:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O68HM-0004zI-GN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:18:17 -0400 Original-Received: from proofpoint1.lanl.gov ([204.121.3.25]:57348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O68HM-0004yw-3r; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:18:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailrelay2.lanl.gov (mailrelay2.lanl.gov [128.165.4.103]) by proofpoint1.lanl.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3PKI9nF004291; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:18:09 -0600 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AEF163DFE5; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:18:09 -0600 (MDT) X-NIE-2-Virus-Scanner: amavisd-new at mailrelay2.lanl.gov Original-Received: from webmail1.lanl.gov (webmail1.lanl.gov [128.165.4.106]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B4E163DFE3; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:18:08 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: by webmail1.lanl.gov (Postfix, from userid 48) id E06EA1CA80E0; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:18:08 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: from 130.55.132.38 (SquirrelMail authenticated user 196434) by webmail.lanl.gov with HTTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:18:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5_4.10.lanl1 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2010-04-24_05:2010-02-06, 2010-04-24, 2010-04-24 signatures=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124205 Archived-At: >> (not that it was ever a documented feature, I suppose); perhaps we should put it back, or [...] > Can you please file a bug with a step by step description of the problem? Is it really a bug? I thought it was just an accidental feature of C-x v v that no longer existed. The docstring doesn't mention the case where Emacs' idea of the file's status is out of date. Davis -- This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during shipping.