From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Undo-limit default Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 14:20:50 +0100 Message-ID: <493BCDB2.1010001@gmx.at> References: <873ah0n4xc.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <493BC963.3000907@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1228656202 27867 80.91.229.12 (7 Dec 2008 13:23:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 07 14:24:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L9JcY-0007Gw-3e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 14:24:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48161 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L9JbJ-0003ly-Vs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:23:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L9JbC-0003jZ-Oo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L9JbA-0003iI-LR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48841 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L9JbA-0003i9-FZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:23:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:41872) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L9Jb9-00072m-RK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:23:00 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Dec 2008 13:22:58 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-51-238.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.51.238]) [62.47.51.238] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 07 Dec 2008 14:22:58 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18jRGw/OakjCCxeYvVHHcuBMGF/dmc3C0WsJbJ5U7 C1Ieq9/bkb0vAv User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.78 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106649 Archived-At: > I thought that the `fontified' property did not go into the undo-list. > Are not the calls changing that property surrounded by macros that > should prevent that? Only those of font-lock itself. > What major modes do you see this in? All font-locked ones. The property is stored as a text property and shows up whenever you delete or reinsert corresponding text. IMHO putting any font-lock handled property on the undo-list is harmful. martin