From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1348: set-frame-width and set-frame-position seem buggy on at least MSWindows Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:17:28 +0100 Message-ID: <49365CB8.5050800@gmx.at> References: 4922BD1F.2080604@gmx.at <492DBE0C.1030707@gmx.de> <492EA390.1020206@gmx.at> <492EDCC9.7070806@gmx.de> <492EF976.1070108@gmx.at> <49319B2E.20006@gmx.de> <49325AAA.5090606@gmx.at> <1228089264.493327b06fd4e@webmail.freedom2surf.net> <49339200.7080603@gmx.at> <1228119737.49339eb964cc6@webmail.freedom2surf.net> <4933AFA5.5020109@gmx.at> <4934D1AF.50905@gmx.de> <49355A23.8030001@gmx.at> <4935CE37.4010206@gmx.de> Reply-To: martin rudalics , 1348@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1228300259 19051 80.91.229.12 (3 Dec 2008 10:30:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1348@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, jasonr@f2s.com To: grischka Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 03 11:32:02 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L7p1V-0001SA-5D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:32:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36648 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L7p0K-0006t1-Oj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 05:30:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L7ozx-0006iS-5D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 05:30:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L7ozu-0006fv-0q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 05:30:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36933 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L7ozt-0006fj-NE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 05:30:21 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:40524) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L7ozt-0003qv-5D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 05:30:21 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mB3AUCVY011953; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:30:14 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mB3AP85P010458; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:25:08 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: martin rudalics Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:25:08 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1348 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1348-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1348.12282995798855 (code B ref 1348); Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:25:08 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1348) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 3 Dec 2008 10:19:39 +0000 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with SMTP id mB3AJZRm008847 for <1348@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:19:37 -0800 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Dec 2008 10:19:30 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-52-242.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.52.242]) [62.47.52.242] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 03 Dec 2008 11:19:30 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19OcHMzOcRO2NejeZATLT+god2teIzjPk7M7z6Weq et6cUJqlVsqYaT User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: <4935CE37.4010206@gmx.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.71 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 05:30:23 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:22895 Archived-At: > Actually -100 doesn't mean anything except to let the "async_visible" > flag alone, because otherwise no frame showed at all, for some reason. But your patch skips more than just the async_visible assignments. >> - if a non-size-related request is in the queue we'd honor it - even it >> has some of our code re-resize frames? >> > Sure, as always. Not really, because the current code doesn't call w32_read_socket until input gets unblocked. >> - if there's another frame we don't care about the >> record_asynch_buffer_change (); stuff? >> > What buffer change? Resize doesn't change buffers, does it? I suppose resizing a frame might do all sorts of nasty things like resizing and deleting windows within the resized frame, switching buffers, showing another menu-/tool-bar, ... martin