From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David De La Harpe Golden Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:58:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4901D46E.7060804@harpegolden.net> References: <20081022091136.GB924@muc.de> <20081022151444.GE924@muc.de> <48FF58FB.6000302@harpegolden.net> <20081022211202.GA1037@muc.de> <49001F5A.7040402@harpegolden.net> <20081023090908.GB2666@muc.de> <4900ACF9.7060501@harpegolden.net> <4900FF17.2000203@harpegolden.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224856731 24133 80.91.229.12 (24 Oct 2008 13:58:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, Lennart Borgman , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 24 15:59:48 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KtNCO-0005VV-Bz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:59:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56409 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KtNBI-0001Iu-PW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:58:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KtNBF-0001If-28 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:58:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KtNBB-0001IH-O2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:58:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54866 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KtNBB-0001IE-Gy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from harpegolden.net ([65.99.215.13]:59417) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KtNBA-0003RF-4U; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:58:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [87.198.54.44] (87-198-54-44.ptr.magnet.ie [87.198.54.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "David De La Harpe Golden", Issuer "David De La Harpe Golden Personal CA rev 3" (verified OK)) by harpegolden.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A3D8088; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:58:13 +0100 (IST) User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081018) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104945 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Also, please compare that with Emacs 22, since this whole thread is > about comparative performance. > > Thanks. Hey now, that may be some thread participants' only concern, but I already noted my concern with the absolute performance...