bug#1121: 23.0.60; `buffer-list' returns buffers in wrong order

[martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 309 bytes --]

 > Yes, I get the same result as you do:
 >
 > (#<buffer  *Minibuf-1*> #<buffer  *Minibuf-2*> #<buffer buf002.txt>
 > #<buffer buf001.txt> #<buffer *scratch*> #<buffer  *Minibuf-0*> ...)

I checked in a fix.  Could you please try whether it changes anything?

Drew.  Could you try the attached patch?

martin

[-- Attachment #2: 1121.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1096 bytes --]

*** window.el.~1.155.~	2008-10-09 09:02:00.531250000 +0200
--- window.el	2008-10-10 16:56:50.343750000 +0200
***************
*** 1063,1072 ****
  	(old-frame (selected-frame))
  	new-window new-frame)
      (set-buffer buffer)
!     (setq new-window (display-buffer buffer other-window) norecord)
      (unless (eq new-window old-window)
        ;; `display-buffer' has chosen another window, select it.
!       (select-window new-window)
        (setq new-frame (window-frame new-window))
        (unless (eq new-frame old-frame)
  	;; `display-buffer' has chosen another frame, make sure it gets
--- 1063,1072 ----
  	(old-frame (selected-frame))
  	new-window new-frame)
      (set-buffer buffer)
!     (setq new-window (display-buffer buffer other-window))
      (unless (eq new-window old-window)
        ;; `display-buffer' has chosen another window, select it.
!       (select-window new-window norecord)
        (setq new-frame (window-frame new-window))
        (unless (eq new-frame old-frame)
  	;; `display-buffer' has chosen another frame, make sure it gets