From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Sanford Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: compilation-next-error and hidden regions Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:43:09 -0700 Message-ID: <48E79D1D.7000706@gmail.com> References: <48E187A0.9070603@gmail.com> <48E795FE.5020900@gmail.com> <48E79B64.3010304@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1223138635 17315 80.91.229.12 (4 Oct 2008 16:43:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 16:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 04 18:44:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KmAFG-0006Iv-RG for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:44:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53385 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KmAED-0000kb-HH for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:43:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KmADu-0000hk-GN for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:43:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KmADs-0000fu-RH for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:43:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56443 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KmADs-0000fl-DG for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:43:16 -0400 Original-Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.174]:63460) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KmADs-0004gq-1B for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:43:16 -0400 Original-Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so2049628wfc.24 for ; Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:43:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2OknuqP1/LaQVN1dQzR28tpq6Y8TxXtfhaH5RjEmfT4=; b=Hl+9yXDQfaQ/8pAPtwIN3TGvWlZU/VLV4uI1ZR8BfFgL4oCjMHAJYrjv/Pv/QyQ6IG Z1mIQxlr1G8a4Er+TxpWbf4S3YMI7b/BrvA3k1D2wKtE87prw/F5STtsBw8xzxTruCj4 hRWaFR31ncOO26/zm6ANle7N5Puva5nyVeOiM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rPYQYGV6dOGlhpQ/RbbD20N5MHkqHgHJdvWqZCEzb3ytsnbOqukp8C5F6CK+qlbi/e jWkRG74iETBCGC0kL7K5difmjHHq8BK+9IPperen5gGXqAnd64bAHslJeMKR1AsP8/zr hUj5A8H+lpvYRq/1/TPx9jyVgOn3WTgKsStTo= Original-Received: by 10.142.214.11 with SMTP id m11mr935719wfg.95.1223138595123; Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:43:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?192.168.2.163? (dsl001-150-252.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [72.1.150.252]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm7538221wfc.19.2008.10.04.09.43.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 04 Oct 2008 09:43:13 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) In-Reply-To: <48E79B64.3010304@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:58355 Archived-At: That's what I'll do. Thanks. Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > No, it is just probably so that no one reading has any good idea about > what to do. > > But it looks like a bug to me. Why not file a bug report? > > > Peter Sanford wrote: >> Is there a better list to ask this question? >> >> Peter Sanford wrote: >>> I recently upgraded to emacs22. Now I have the problem that >>> when I call compilation-next-error in a buffer that has a hidden region >>> (from hide-copyleft.el), emacs jumps to the wrong spot (off by the >>> number of hidden lines in the copyright). >>> >>> Can anyone shed some light onto this issue? >>> Does compile.el ignore selective-display and it didn't before? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Peter >> >> >>