From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Sanford Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: compilation-next-error and hidden regions Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:57:52 -0700 Message-ID: <48E187A0.9070603@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1222751093 10371 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2008 05:04:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:04:53 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 30 07:05:51 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KkXQU-0008Ii-6z for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:05:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55026 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KkXPR-0008K4-Hd for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:04:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkUV0-0004C7-66 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkUUy-00049p-0y for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58195 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KkUUx-00049m-RO for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:57:59 -0400 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.177]:50247) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KkUUx-0005Ry-91 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:57:59 -0400 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k40so1163439wah.26 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:57:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2AeoL/6B1ej9j9XYg39Hd2YVIe/WuKm9VK86hcdab+A=; b=mwnFPjufUyjlcYjS16obuLd5chjAQ1FZcYIjTaq9f8vPnWYunwxbzzKmr1qFqBvjvy ZKF3WMM/c6vsELJ/r7TaoGCyqD68wbi/tSC6ICleSLeWslHgPISU+H+IFfQhuw7rYBWr wseSFR0/oklEZKpoA/F4AR9oyg8Z5N7pE4V9Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AP3VecR0lqrnMtq8iOw+ulJFY2ePt1Mi+a4biKUp4jUWM/v7dXr7hBHiHMu/6nDwWE Z4/36+gStDHixn+gHI+OYCzu8wDy0D3DG5U5ujRxgmIQsrrv8TGEJy9dfdzGbSuhGtMp bm3E/RxNw1quUH4lccnFA/Uvn1ha16YezoRWE= Original-Received: by 10.114.158.1 with SMTP id g1mr6828596wae.111.1222739877295; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?10.2.29.247? (71-6-94-162.static-ip.telepacific.net [71.6.94.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q18sm1152756pog.9.2008.09.29.18.57.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:57:56 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:00:50 -0400 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:58219 Archived-At: I recently upgraded to emacs22. Now I have the problem that when I call compilation-next-error in a buffer that has a hidden region (from hide-copyleft.el), emacs jumps to the wrong spot (off by the number of hidden lines in the copyright). Can anyone shed some light onto this issue? Does compile.el ignore selective-display and it didn't before? Thanks, Peter