From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: How to get rid of *GNU Emacs* buffer on start-up? Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:43:38 +0200 Message-ID: <48D92ACA.2090408@gmail.com> References: <87ljxoffs6.fsf@atthis.clsnet.nl> <2868c8db-ff02-4d67-9e80-4cf323086ca3@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <3bd3a963-a71c-4754-94e9-3a93cdc0cdf7@k36g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <90accfe9-0e65-4230-93a7-9b07422bd382@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1222191862 16844 80.91.229.12 (23 Sep 2008 17:44:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Xah Lee Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 23 19:45:18 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KiBwl-0007fm-Tg for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:45:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34875 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KiBvj-0004Xr-FG for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:44:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KiBvS-0004Xm-WA for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:43:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KiBvR-0004XY-GK for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:43:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53905 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KiBvR-0004XV-Av for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:43:49 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:44904) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KiBvQ-0005Vg-Li for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:43:49 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-87.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.87]:63485 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KiBvM-0006H6-53; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:43:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080923-0, 2008-09-23), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.87 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KiBvM-0006H6-53. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KiBvM-0006H6-53 0635f9eac6b4d967c004e1be15194d44 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:57966 Archived-At: Xah Lee wrote: > On Sep 23, 9:47 am, "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" > wrote: >> XahLeewrote: >>> So, for someone with RSI symptom, we can suppose 2 solution: >>> (1) Stop or lessen the amount of time spent on typing. >>> (2) Do some amout of typing, but when not typing, do more general >>> exercise such as akido. >> Yes, that is right. > > In my previous post, i made a critical typo. > > I wrote: > « > (1) Stop or lessen the amount of time spent on typing. > > (2) Do some amout of typing, but when not typing, do more general > exercise such as akido. > » > > The “Do some amount of typing” should be “Do same amount of typing”. > >>> Which one is actually more likely to help? And if we are forced to >>> choose one, it is undeniable that (1) is the answer. >> I think both may be necessary, but I actually think that 2 is the most >> important point. >> >> In the acute situation, like with any injury, you have of course to get >> away from what is causing the injury. >> >> However in the long run that might not at all be what helps. > > You are a fool. LOL. Maybe. But I am an optimist. You have some logical elements in your thinking after all.