From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Specifying mode in file variables trouble Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:33:52 +0200 Message-ID: <48D63F30.8060102@gmail.com> References: <48D44761.6000809@gmail.com> <87ljxny6n8.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <48D44C79.9020004@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1222000457 21349 80.91.229.12 (21 Sep 2008 12:34:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 21 14:35:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KhO9h-0005uv-Sr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:35:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54145 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KhO8f-0003Qu-W3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 08:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KhO8b-0003QF-FS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 08:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KhO8Z-0003PX-Ur for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 08:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41392 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KhO8Z-0003PQ-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 08:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:60838) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KhO8V-0006aj-Ge; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 08:33:59 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-87.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.87]:61579 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KhO8T-0002S4-5t; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:33:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080920-0, 2008-09-20), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.87 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KhO8T-0002S4-5t. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KhO8T-0002S4-5t 266a5420556d5d73762858d9e3f0b47e X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104012 Archived-At: Richard M. Stallman wrote: > But it is not a major mode, that is why it does not end in "-mode". It > ends in "-mumamo" which stands for "multi major mode" here. > > Maybe it should still end in "-mode", but I think it could be more > confusing than helping actually. > > Why do you think it is not a major mode? A major mode is simply a > command that specifies the overall way to handle the contents of a > buffer. I think this command qualifies. > > So its name should end in `-mode'. Ok, I am convinced. I have changed the name convention so that multi major modes now ends in "-mumamo-mode" (instead of the old "-mumamo").