From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS Emacs on Windows XP takes 60 seconds to start Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:57:57 +0800 Message-ID: <48BDE115.4060703@gnu.org> References: <48BD9EA0.60608@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220403541 21551 80.91.229.12 (3 Sep 2008 00:59:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 00:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Francis Litterio Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 03 02:59:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kagix-0000Uk-PC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:59:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49865 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kaghy-0002B5-P3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:58:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kaghu-0002Az-BQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:58:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kaghr-0002An-UG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:58:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56072 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kaghr-0002Ak-PV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:58:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.23]:25682) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kaghr-0005pk-BP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:58:47 -0400 Original-X-Trace: 165206107/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$F2S-INTERNET-ACCEPTED/None/61.4.103.130 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 61.4.103.130 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuoAADR+vUg9BGeC/2dsb2JhbAAItQeBaQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,320,1217804400"; d="scan'208";a="165206107" X-IP-Direction: OUT Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [10.1.1.133]) ([61.4.103.130]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2008 01:58:44 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103458 Archived-At: Francis Litterio wrote: > Is this issue likely to bite other people? Can we assume that the > Windows host has RPC access to its domain controllers and/or LDAP > servers? > In the case of laptops, you can't assume the domain controller will always be there, but perhaps the failure happens more quickly in that case (in the firewall case, the system may have enough connectivity to the domain controller to not give up so easily). I haven't noticed such a long delay with my laptop disconnected from the company network (though I have noticed delays of around 10 seconds).