From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#865: 23.0.60; The directory is unsafe today Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:41:20 +0200 Message-ID: <48BDCF20.1080305@gmail.com> References: <48BD642C.5050405@gmail.com> <48BDC0EE.1080104@gmail.com> <48BDC5E4.4080205@gmail.com> <48BDC832.40503@gmail.com> <48BDC9F1.8090105@gmail.com> <48BDCBD1.4000505@gmail.com> Reply-To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220400479 15017 80.91.229.12 (3 Sep 2008 00:07:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 00:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 03 02:08:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KafvX-0007es-Kb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:08:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49204 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KafuY-0002bS-Hw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:07:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KafuL-0002Ul-Ay for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:07:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KafuI-0002Sp-Jh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:07:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48197 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KafuI-0002Sm-Dc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:07:34 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:52163) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KafuH-0007hr-S4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:07:34 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8307U8j028587; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 17:07:31 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m82No3f3021410; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:50:03 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:50:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 865 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 865-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B865.122039888719359 (code B ref 865); Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:50:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 865) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Sep 2008 23:41:27 +0000 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m82NfN2M019353 for <865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:41:25 -0700 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-87.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.87]:61723 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KafUx-0006jr-6w; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:41:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080902-0, 2008-09-02), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.87 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KafUx-0006jr-6w. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1KafUx-0006jr-6w ad839c7db5219a3325afe98d7d3a474e X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:07:35 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20057 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 01:27, Lennart Borgman (gmail) > wrote: > >> So you mean there is no more problem if the old file was not deleted? > > I didn't say that. But the problem is not that you deleted it or not, > but whether that affects creating the new server-file or opening the > new local socket. > >> Why delete it at all in that case? > > Cleanup is a good prophilactic measure, but it is not always required: But in this case the dirt is back just in few lines below ... > (with-temp-file "~/temp.dat" (insert "Hi!")) > (with-temp-file "~/temp.dat" (insert "Bye!")) > > Juanma >