From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32? Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:25:04 +0200 Message-ID: <48BAFE20.5070100@gmail.com> References: <48B7288E.3040503@gmail.com> <48B7AC10.6090800@gmail.com> <48B7B08B.6050103@gmail.com> <48B7F905.7060605@gmail.com> <001301c909e8$d63092e0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <20080829155801.05fabc31.taylor@metasyntax.net> <48B85740.8060309@gmail.com> <20080829164637.4211a5b7.taylor@metasyntax.net> <48B86366.7040303@gmail.com> <87ljyfxz25.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> <48B87432.6050902@gmail.com> <20080830100336.17179835.taylor@metasyntax.net> <48B95505.50808@gmail.com> <87iqtijfr9.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <48B9D20A.6080604@harpegolden.net> <87abetkg7j.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <48BA4077.5040309@harpegolden.net> <48BA64F4.8090403@harpegolden.net> <48BAB318.4040403@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220214361 24029 80.91.229.12 (31 Aug 2008 20:26:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, david@harpegolden.net To: ams@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 31 22:26:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZtVd-0007Sk-7k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:26:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37670 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZtUe-0006xF-LM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:25:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZtU5-0006WJ-7Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:25:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZtU3-0006Up-P3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:25:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40015 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZtU3-0006UX-9A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:45180) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZtTx-0004Wz-NF; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:25:10 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-87.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.87]:61903 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KZtTv-0002bS-5C; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:25:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080831-0, 2008-08-31), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.87 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KZtTv-0002bS-5C. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KZtTv-0002bS-5C 2eef3f333ff2d8117d0da53ea71fc285 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103338 Archived-At: Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > I think it is quite a bad idea to make emacs behave like GNOME, > > and other such enviroments. Emacs is vastly different from them, > > and just making users think that Emacs somehow behaves like GNOME > > is bad for the users; it doesn't beave at all like GNOME. > > Are you not assuming that users do not expect Emacs to behave like > other applications in the GUI environment they are using? > > I do not expect a KDE program to look, or behave like a GNOME program. That is fine and I expect you to not expect that ;-) But why extrapolate that to the potential base of new users that are out there, somewhere?