From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32? Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:34:17 +0200 Message-ID: <48BA0329.40908@gmail.com> References: <48B7288E.3040503@gmail.com> <48B7F905.7060605@gmail.com> <001301c909e8$d63092e0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <20080829153958.GB1053@muc.de> <87iqthdid5.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220150076 24140 80.91.229.12 (31 Aug 2008 02:34:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sean Sieger Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 31 04:35:30 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZcmn-0001lJ-PF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:35:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36709 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZclp-000551-2C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:34:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZclj-00053q-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:34:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZclj-00053U-4O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:34:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56704 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZclj-00053N-1o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:34:23 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]:36210) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZcli-0006ZY-Ph for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:34:23 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-87.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.87]:65151 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KZclh-0006M9-6i; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:34:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <87iqthdid5.fsf@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080830-0, 2008-08-30), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.87 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KZclh-0006M9-6i. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1KZclh-0006M9-6i 1e047066ae0c397807428e0bef42b241 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103288 Archived-At: Sean Sieger wrote: > Alan Mackenzie writes: > > Hah! I don't use dired at all (except by accident, when I curse for > having to type C-x k to get rid of it). > > `q' might be a little less exasperating. But is not that using dired a little bit ...