From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32? Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:41:51 +0200 Message-ID: <48B9B08F.5040506@gmail.com> References: <48B7288E.3040503@gmail.com> <48B73AA9.5090900@gnu.org> <48B73D8F.90501@gmail.com> <48B7AC10.6090800@gmail.com> <48B7B08B.6050103@gmail.com> <48B7F905.7060605@gmail.com> <001301c909e8$d63092e0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <20080829155801.05fabc31.taylor@metasyntax.net> <48B85740.8060309@gmail.com> <20080829164637.4211a5b7.taylor@metasyntax.net> <48B86366.7040303@gmail.com> <87ljyfxz25.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> <48B87432.6050902@gmail.com> <87bpzaygrn.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220128935 13158 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2008 20:42:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Phil Jackson Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 30 22:43:10 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZXHo-0000uO-8c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:43:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51833 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZXGp-00067q-Cy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:42:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZXGk-00067O-Rj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZXGi-00066l-TQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:42:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38582 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZXGi-00066Y-P5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:42:00 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:36422) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZXGi-0001mL-Fn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:42:00 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-87.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.87]:62309 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KZXGg-0005mG-61; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:41:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <87bpzaygrn.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080830-0, 2008-08-30), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.87 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KZXGg-0005mG-61. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KZXGg-0005mG-61 2eefbcb8ee0cfe407b3995703039229f X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103276 Archived-At: Phil Jackson wrote: > "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > >>> One can make assumptions about a Windows system (like every user using >>> explorer.exe), but not really about a GNU/Linux system. >> Is not that then a shortcoming of GNU/Linux compared with Windows? > > No with GNU/Linux you have choice. My system works exactly the way I > want it and not the way any corp. wants it to. It is a wonder if it works exactly as you want. Not even Emacs do that for me ...