From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32? Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:33:23 +0200 Message-ID: <48B89553.6050205@gmail.com> References: <48B7288E.3040503@gmail.com> <48B7F905.7060605@gmail.com> <001301c909e8$d63092e0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <20080829153958.GB1053@muc.de> <001501c909f4$c40175b0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220056446 4387 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2008 00:34:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , jasonr@gnu.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Kyllingstad?= , Drew Adams To: David House Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 30 02:35:00 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZEQY-0005nL-P4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:34:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57103 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZEPa-0006Pq-8Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZEPM-0006FT-H2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZEPL-0006DV-2J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:33:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49283 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZEPK-0006DD-Te for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:33:38 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]:58271) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZEPE-0006yr-79; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:33:32 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-87.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.87]:65299 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KZEP8-0008GY-6i; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:33:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080829-0, 2008-08-29), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.87 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KZEP8-0008GY-6i. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1KZEP8-0008GY-6i df2c8dd254a15269810c24865d51cf8c X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103235 Archived-At: David House wrote: > 2008/8/29 René Kyllingstad : >>> I still feel the best default is to send the file to trash without >>> asking any questions, then inform the user that this has happened. >>> (E.g. (message "File sent to trash folder %s" path-to-trash).) This >> And mentions: " to undo". It doesn't get in your way, >> but in case it was a quick mistake you immediately see how to fix it (this >> is how gmail handles similar actions, and it's just brilliant). > > Does anyone else have any feelings on this? This seems like a really > nice way to implement things, but this subthread seems to have been > lost in the flow. Didn't I mention that I think it is a quite nice suggestion? (But I can't see that there is any need to mention where the trash can is as suggested above.)