From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32? Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:26:29 +0200 Message-ID: <48B7F905.7060605@gmail.com> References: <48B7288E.3040503@gmail.com> <48B73AA9.5090900@gnu.org> <48B73D8F.90501@gmail.com> <48B7AC10.6090800@gmail.com> <48B7B08B.6050103@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220016419 19641 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2008 13:26:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David House , jasonr@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 29 15:27:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZ410-0006Ez-DB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:27:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39096 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZ401-0004CP-NH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:26:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZ3zw-0004Ap-IK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:26:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZ3zv-0004A4-Vl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:26:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37112 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZ3zv-00049z-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:26:43 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:47545) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZ3zp-0007xO-5S; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:26:37 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-87.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.87]:62149 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KZ3zn-0005n7-3X; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:26:35 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080828-0, 2008-08-28), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.87 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KZ3zn-0005n7-3X. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KZ3zn-0005n7-3X 4acdbc9de0ebfefe60e34f137109f5dd X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103173 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > We are talking about Emacs here. Emacs behavior was always that it > deletes a file, not moves it somewhere. So any change in that > behavior _by_default_ will surprise Emacs users. Then maybe a compromize could be to tell it in a prominent way so that users have a good chance to notice it?