From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32? Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:37:02 +0200 Message-ID: <48B7288E.3040503@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1219963047 20303 80.91.229.12 (28 Aug 2008 22:37:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:37:27 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 29 00:38:21 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KYq8C-0006To-Il for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:38:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36118 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KYq7D-00013P-1T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:37:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KYq78-00013K-Se for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:37:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KYq77-00012q-9U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:37:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51209 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KYq77-00012m-3j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:37:13 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:51220) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KYq75-0007c0-QH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:37:12 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-87.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.87]:64955 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KYq72-0001KM-4J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:37:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080828-0, 2008-08-28), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.87 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KYq72-0001KM-4J. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KYq72-0001KM-4J 0b26cdfb65090d4091058355658e1f60 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103114 Archived-At: I just deleted a file because I misunderstood dired. I needed that file (of course). And then I found that dired did not make any backup and did not use windows Recycle bin. This behaviour does not make me trust for example GNU/Linux. I would beleive this is a behaviour implemented after how things work there. Is this correct? Does Emacs behave this way on GNU/Linus too?