From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:25:20 +0200 Message-ID: <48A1D590.2090608@gmail.com> References: <22745878.701461218564286113.JavaMail.www@wwinf4623> <48A1D499.5020206@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218565559 5282 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2008 18:25:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: alinsoar@voila.fr Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 12 20:26:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KSyZi-0000cO-OB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:26:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51648 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSyYm-00086D-F9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:25:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSyYi-000868-VR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:25:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSyYg-00085w-It for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:25:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58280 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSyYg-00085t-DF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:25:26 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]:41054) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KSyYf-0007b6-TR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:25:26 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-176.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.176]:65211 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KSyYe-00033Z-6T; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:25:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <48A1D499.5020206@gmail.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080812-0, 2008-08-12), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.176 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KSyYe-00033Z-6T. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1KSyYe-00033Z-6T 7d6addecb900ca4a7602fffd40c04788 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102357 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > A Soare wrote: >>>> I told you: everything depends of education. >>> > No, from my viewpoint emacs is better. >>>> But in the same time I realise that from their viewpoint other >>>> editors are better. >>> > I tolerate their education. >>> >>> But does not that mean that you say that your education is better? >>> That you have learned something that they have not (yet)? >> >> The word good-best-better is a kind of recursion in nature. > > Ok, it looked to me that you were trying to say that developing Emacs on > windows was useless because of your view. That would be a very > egocentric argument and not useful for conclusions about what to do. > > You have probably explained why it is not useful in a way that I have > missed. > >> If you take care about this definition, the loop dissapears. It >> reduces to discrimination. If you go on with further this discussion, >> you make discrimination. Everything is relative to this world. A fish >> cannot say that he leaves better than a man, and vice versa. >> You did not understand. The web site where I have my pretty and most >> lovely mail account add this banner. > > Maybe, but what i wanted to say was that you mail program does not work > ok. So perhaps it would be best if you used some other mail program. Or maybe it is rather a bug in Thunderbird client? I can see now that the lines gets wrapped in my reply, but I have trouble reading your message in Thunderbird when I am editing my reply. This is quite annoying. Is there anyone who understand what is wrong?