From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:59:13 +0200 Message-ID: <48A1B351.6030601@gmail.com> References: <21008147.1159571218555258195.JavaMail.www@wwinf4616> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218556961 6198 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2008 16:02:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: alinsoar@voila.fr Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 12 18:03:31 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KSwKc-0005I3-VC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:02:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37842 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSwJf-000145-GM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:01:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSwHR-0007UZ-Dz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:59:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSwHN-0007Qs-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:59:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36956 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSwHN-0007Pz-Gs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:59:25 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]:35056) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KSwHM-0005cK-If for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:59:25 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-176.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.176]:64993 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KSwHE-0006Sw-6W; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:59:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <21008147.1159571218555258195.JavaMail.www@wwinf4616> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080812-0, 2008-08-12), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.176 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KSwHE-0006Sw-6W. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1KSwHE-0006Sw-6W b59b7aaace147fa5c8888c57694805f4 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102347 Archived-At: A Soare wrote: >>>>> No, there is no contradiction in what I say. >>>> Are you sure? Didn't you say that the developers you know do not use >>>> Emacs on Windows because there are better software for their purpose on >>>> Windows? And didn't you mean that you trust them? >>> If you think at the definition of "good-better-best" from _their_ >> > viewpoint, there is no contradiction. >> >> Yes, that is right. But are you not overlooking the possibility that the >> software they use might be superior even if not making fast money is >> your goal? > > I told you: everything depends of education. > No, from my viewpoint emacs is better. > But in the same time I realise that from their viewpoint other editors are better. > I tolerate their education. But does not that mean that you say that your education is better? That you have learned something that they have not (yet)? > Now I see. Voila. It would be nice if you find a way to fix the line wrapping (and told the developers of the software that is malfunctioning of course).