From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#643: Battery update Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:18:57 +0200 Message-ID: <489B3C91.7010605@gmail.com> References: <87bq04dbqc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218133179 11626 80.91.229.12 (7 Aug 2008 18:19:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 18:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emre Sahin , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong , 643@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 07 20:20:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KRA5y-0003BM-8g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:20:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60925 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KRA52-0007Ye-N0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:19:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRA4x-0007YO-VN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:19:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRA4w-0007YC-GS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:19:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33372 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KRA4w-0007Y9-BA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:19:14 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:60898) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KRA4w-0000Uw-BZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:19:14 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-176.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.176]:64153 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KRA4r-0007Ua-5f; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:19:09 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <87bq04dbqc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080807-0, 2008-08-07), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.176 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KRA4r-0007Ua-5f. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KRA4r-0007Ua-5f f3bef03eea4f7bc268e835aef7a00458 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102168 Archived-At: Chong Yidong wrote: > Even though it's the feature freeze, I think it's necessary to ensure > that battery.el works at least at a basic level. Just out of curiosity: Why is it necessary that battery.el works? Is not this information something that the OS normally gives the user without Emacs?