From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: line-move-visual never set to nil? Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:43:12 +0200 Message-ID: <4892CCA0.8060007@gmail.com> References: <18571.25125.311010.324079@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87od4k1nj5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <1F7E32D0-7C19-4950-94DB-F6CD33A56EB0@gmail.com> <6161f3180807290043l2b0cc1as85a338204687f183@mail.gmail.com> <87y73kbvz3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4891F546.2080505@gmail.com> <8763ql7hmk.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <48924CE0.9090603@gmail.com> <489257E0.7010409@harpegolden.net> <489258D8.60602@gmail.com> <48925FB5.8090103@harpegolden.net> <48926058.2000007@gmail.com> <48926BA9.1090601@harpegolden.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217580237 20311 80.91.229.12 (1 Aug 2008 08:43:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, david.reitter@gmail.com, Chong Yidong , andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, raman@users.sourceforge.net, Miles Bader To: David De La Harpe Golden Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 01 10:44:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KOqFZ-00028g-TF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:44:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47977 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOqEe-0000Xi-Qd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:43:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOqEX-0000VU-5n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:43:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOqEV-0000S8-DE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:43:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35086 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOqEV-0000RT-5I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:43:31 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]:57137) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KOqEN-0004RD-29; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:43:23 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-176.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.176]:60963 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KOqEK-00031V-8X; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:43:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <48926BA9.1090601@harpegolden.net> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080731-0, 2008-07-31), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.176 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KOqEK-00031V-8X. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1KOqEK-00031V-8X 744b8bc8310136e8295ad2748c4e1b7e X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101849 Archived-At: David De La Harpe Golden wrote: > Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > >> Maybe that is a good idea, but it still does not help the user that is >> typing the visual move variants during macro recording. > > It means the user can choose the appropriate one, whether inside or > outside macro recording. Since it shouldn't make a difference if you're > recording a macro or not... > > Even if you do want to (or provide an option to) "help" IMO the way to > do it would be to have the keyboard macro definition remember an > associated window-width, and have keyboard macro playback temporarily > apply that window-width during playback (not necessarily visually > resizing the window). That seems far nicer than meddling with > line-move-visual on entering macro definition and playback. > Would probably require some C-level work. I can see the idea, but I fear that with all details this may be very complicated. But I am not sure.