From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this? Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:18:49 +0200 Message-ID: <48921019.6030308@gmail.com> References: <20080729222754.GC2208@muc.de> <86myjx3lt8.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217532048 26705 80.91.229.12 (31 Jul 2008 19:20:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:20:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Romain Francoise , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 31 21:21:38 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KOdhC-0003Lw-Fg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:20:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35958 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOdgH-0003X8-Nk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:19:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOdg4-0003Mf-DV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:19:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOdg1-0003Ii-0o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:19:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46084 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOdg0-0003IW-Qu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:19:04 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:52947) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KOdg0-0001Xx-Fh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:19:04 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-176.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.176]:64759 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KOdfv-0004gp-58; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:19:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <86myjx3lt8.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080731-0, 2008-07-31), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.176 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KOdfv-0004gp-58. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KOdfv-0004gp-58 f2fb59936b5c8f8672d9ad1c22c48c88 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101825 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:27:54 +0000 Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > AM> Why won't our CVS head build NEARLY ALL THE TIME!!! > > It's not hard to set up automated builds; I wouldn't use something like > CruiseControl but a simple tool like buildbot or even a shell script > would be nice (cvs up && configure && make bootstrap etc) Failure > notifications can be sent to a central server and more than N (maybe 5?) > failures in the same place would trigger a bug report or some other > notification. > > CPAN has a nice way to do this with a whole network of testers, so when > you submit a module failed tests go back to you. > > Sorry if this has been discussed before but I didn't see such a thread. It was discussed before, but I do not know what happened then http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-04/msg01011.html