From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Kyle M. Lee" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: segmentation fault displaying etc/HELLO on Windows Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:49:40 +0800 Message-ID: <48911A34.7060008@gmail.com> References: <48900ED2.2000703@gnu.org> <4890670C.9000009@gnu.org> <48906865.4000808@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217469002 30823 80.91.229.12 (31 Jul 2008 01:50:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs- devel , Jason Rumney To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 31 03:50:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KONJZ-0003Z5-Uf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:50:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60394 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KONIf-0004Cz-06 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:49:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KONIY-0004Cf-Ak for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:49:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KONIX-0004C2-SD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:49:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52777 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KONIX-0004Bw-Bs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:49:45 -0400 Original-Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.172]:55996) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KONIX-0000LO-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:49:45 -0400 Original-Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so258283wfc.24 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:49:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SylNTMvD+6eLWdzKZtbyJ/i88Nx2ywnuswY38gmIs6o=; b=VoRR/5wwGzL3n4YF/0SLkgUs0wQLCVDiROloTd+C0uySWk30mmmfjrBh2JV3qJ9nrZ G4Qsu8UOXkzL1TaxXFBp57KpIcO6WMf/fMjiHqxa2tHBHfdLFzvimPEIs6d+malfLucc g5ljAcKwDJz+l+CeB0Ucs6mvoydHyuo6uSc+4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=h9UegA5AovdNu4HJFOdAkMYsWm7Qu/6aq/alGgcfvmb1rBqT7huTXLZVxlcNUI7c24 GNKpNlEE4S+s9bVNQujtgqy9M2OEyJrO7A83HRjDjIdekAiu/wnQ31w4iMrGIiDu1zY0 Jr3SHcShVrr2Lj1kJ3rRtizBgyr0gBEL0sxDQ= Original-Received: by 10.142.215.5 with SMTP id n5mr3048173wfg.131.1217468983501; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:49:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?192.168.1.2? ( [116.30.150.140]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 29sm3131019wfg.0.2008.07.30.18.49.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:49:43 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101775 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero 写道: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 15:11, Jason Rumney wrote: > >> Indeed, that was the problem. I reduced the buffer size to 1, since >> characters that produce multiple glyphs can't be handled properly by >> uniscribe_encode_char, but passed in a size of 20 (a number I'd picked >> after I'd come across Indic characters that produce more than the 2 >> glyphs I'd originally allowed for) to the system function. > > I can confirm that it doesn't crash anymore. > Does that mean I have to compile the cvs emacs with --no-opt ?