From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs vista build failures Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:45:37 +0200 Message-ID: <488AC811.2070306@gmail.com> References: <36366a980807101702r5677d096g8e62ef5b3e278868@mail.gmail.com> <20080713214648.GB1076@muc.de> <20080714195651.GF3445@muc.de> <487C5FA3.4070603@emf.net> <87zloggji9.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <878wvxxkn6.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ej5oz4pb.fsf@saeurebad.de> <87vdyzxype.fsf@saeurebad.de> <871w1njq32.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87iquzxgtk.fsf@saeurebad.de> <4884CFEF.8040404@gmail.com> <48861A51.1090401@gmail.com> <4887C77C.2090109@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217054774 16288 80.91.229.12 (26 Jul 2008 06:46:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 06:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=D3scar_Fuentes?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 26 08:47:02 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KMdYO-0001lv-So for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:46:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59838 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KMdXV-0001zA-6u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KMdXR-0001z4-1u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:45:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KMdXO-0001ys-Do for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:45:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43741 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KMdXO-0001yp-9l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:45:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:15115) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KMdXL-0006Oz-41; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:45:51 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KMdXJ-0005ra-Mt; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:45:49 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-176.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.176]:61517 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KMdXI-0006Mp-3g; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:45:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080725-1, 2008-07-25), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.176 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KMdXI-0006Mp-3g. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KMdXI-0006Mp-3g a36d272e2d908643e799305cb0588e45 X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101502 Archived-At: Richard M Stallman wrote: > If your career as a computer programmer consists of > developing proprietary software, I hope that career ends soon. I would like to believe that you speak as a free software advocate when you write this and that there is no personal feelings in your words, but I am unable to understand your thinking here. If you consider the sum of all the consequences that Óscar looses his job, why do you think this is beneficial for free software?