bug#150: 23.0.60; html-mode syntactic fontification error at line 164

bug#150: 23.0.60; html-mode syntactic fontification error at line 164

[Chong Yidong]

> This is a rather strange fontification error. Sometimes lines after a 
> certain line or the last part of the line itself gets fontified as 
> strings (which is incorrect) and sometimes not. I do not believe I am 
> able to make a simple example of this. Instead I have put up a copy of 
> the file where I saw it on the web:
>
>   http://ourcomments.org/Emacs/DL/html-syntactic-err-l164.html
>
> To reproduce the error download this file, start Emacs with
>
>   emacs -Q
>
> open the file (switch to html-mode if it is not opened in html-mode) and 
> go to line 164. There can be a little bit different errors, but the most 
> common is that the lines below this line are fontified as string. I 
> found right now that if I do
>
>   M-g g 164
>
> then I see the error above. However if I scroll down line by line to 
> line 164 then the fontification is ok.

I can't reproduce this.  Do you still see it happening?

bug#150: 23.0.60; html-mode syntactic fontification error at line 164

[Lennart Borgman (gmail)]

Chong Yidong wrote:
>> This is a rather strange fontification error. Sometimes lines after a 
>> certain line or the last part of the line itself gets fontified as 
>> strings (which is incorrect) and sometimes not. I do not believe I am 
>> able to make a simple example of this. Instead I have put up a copy of 
>> the file where I saw it on the web:
>>
>>   http://ourcomments.org/Emacs/DL/html-syntactic-err-l164.html
>>
>> To reproduce the error download this file, start Emacs with
>>
>>   emacs -Q
>>
>> open the file (switch to html-mode if it is not opened in html-mode) and 
>> go to line 164. There can be a little bit different errors, but the most 
>> common is that the lines below this line are fontified as string. I 
>> found right now that if I do
>>
>>   M-g g 164
>>
>> then I see the error above. However if I scroll down line by line to 
>> line 164 then the fontification is ok.
> 
> I can't reproduce this.  Do you still see it happening?

No, I think I do not think so. Thanks.