From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gdb-ui, dedicated windows Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:47:35 +0200 Message-ID: <487272D7.8020107@gmail.com> References: <87zlowwyn1.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu> <18543.18102.11098.763936@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18545.42910.825681.693892@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87tzf18p5o.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1215460080 14686 80.91.229.12 (7 Jul 2008 19:48:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:48:00 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 07 21:48:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KFwhW-0005qX-F2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:48:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60087 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KFwgf-0004iQ-5P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:47:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KFwgZ-0004er-U9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:47:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KFwgY-0004dX-KA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:47:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56228 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KFwgY-0004dH-6z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:47:42 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]:37388) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KFwgX-00081j-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:47:42 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-59.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.59]:64005 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KFwgV-0001hH-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:47:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <87tzf18p5o.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080707-0, 2008-07-07), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.145.59 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KFwgV-0001hH-8K. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1KFwgV-0001hH-8K 802bcc2281fbe89c2f9ae8cae20abadb X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100426 Archived-At: David Hansen wrote: > On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:40:59 -0600 Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>>>> "Nick" == Nick Roberts writes: >> Tom> To achieve this, a few changes are needed. First, Emacs needs a >> Tom> new way to maximize a frame so it doesn't overshadow the panel. >> >> Nick> I'm not sure what you mean. Emacs appears maximise a frame like >> Nick> any other application and the (Gnome) planel always remains >> Nick> visible for me. >> >> Try: >> >> (modify-frame-parameters nil '((fullscreen . fullboth))) >> >> For me this covers the whole screen. I reported this last year >> sometime ... Emacs needs a new fullscreen mode that respects the fd.o >> standard here. (It needs the current mode for presentation apps.) > > Just a bit curious, isn't it the window managers job to put the window > into full screen? At least that's the way I do it. But I don't have a > panel or stuff, so maybe these problems don't exits here at all. Yes, I think at least on w32 it is the window manager's job.