From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: X fonts selection weirdness Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:05:24 +0100 Message-ID: <4861FC44.1050603@gnu.org> References: <20080624.145703.566779761171555788.kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp> <20080624.180802.154682915676368965.kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214381186 32091 80.91.229.12 (25 Jun 2008 08:06:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Yoshiaki Kasahara , Kenichi Handa To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 25 10:07:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KBQ1h-0004Z4-Jg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:06:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43421 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KBQ0r-0001q2-W9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:05:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KBQ0l-0001pl-L1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KBQ0j-0001pZ-R6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:05:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34526 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KBQ0j-0001pW-JU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:05:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:21686) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KBQ0e-0003Pc-Ar; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:05:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.32]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KBQ0d-0000ZT-Bo; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:05:43 -0400 Original-X-Trace: 102527249/mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAFyZYUhTQxds/2dsb2JhbACBW7At X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,700,1204502400"; d="scan'208";a="102527249" X-IP-Direction: IN Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO wanchan.jasonrumney.net) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2008 09:05:41 +0100 Original-Received: from [192.168.249.27] (chiko.jasonrumney.net [192.168.249.27]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1993E2EC; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:06:46 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=8086879D X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99898 Archived-At: Miles Bader wrote: > Kenichi Handa writes: >> The above should work, but I'm now thinking about >> introducing non-default-font-script-list: > .. >> Documentation: >> List of scripts not to display by the default font. >> Usually, the font specified for ASCII characters is also used >> to display a non-ASCII character if the font supports that character. >> But, if a character belongs to one of these scripts, a font for it is >> determined by looking up the current fontset and the default fontset. > > Why would you do that though? > > If the user choose a default font capable of displaying one of those > charsets, it seems like he would _want_ the default font to be used! Conversely, if the user has explicitly specified fonts in a fontset, then they expect those fonts to be used, not just for specific scripts.