From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23/NS: redraws according to mouse-face are slow Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 13:32:43 -0400 Message-ID: <48600A00-7FAE-4B80-8B3D-6615230918AF@gmail.com> References: <4383E9F6-9B66-4DA4-AA3C-D602EB059B97@gmail.com> <139B721E-A1B4-4256-B202-D4472C0331FB@gmail.com> <87d4aowc1l.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <2E6E5869-2F70-4AF5-A917-7EA863D6BD42@gmail.com> <1ACB40A8-4422-4B9A-A0F7-FE0B9C738299@gmail.com> <87ab5rvds7.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241544826 18087 80.91.229.12 (5 May 2009 17:33:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 17:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2530@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, "\\ Ian Eure" , Adrian Robert , Emacs-Devel devel To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 05 19:33:36 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M1OWN-000401-Q9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 19:33:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33637 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M1OWN-00022U-7s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 13:33:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M1OVg-0001Rv-1m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 13:32:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M1OVb-0001LD-8j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 13:32:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54313 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M1OVa-0001Kv-VF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 13:32:47 -0400 Original-Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.150]:42545) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M1OVa-0007h4-Kn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 13:32:46 -0400 Original-Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so3514282qwk.24 for ; Tue, 05 May 2009 10:32:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=MuW5F0Q51iLYdTl7S7CfEf/o/worsETrqyK3Zv1ZDsg=; b=IHS1T72Fm7rb6+SCHQnPiWXcNnxkTjZBuNRMTVewbzMy4TZOIpk0z6YygY0KMtHhh0 fCrHZktnhNr8ZZ0brte3kNLxB9BNt+bgF8AqK2USkYQ8eIkRbCdRbLVieq9+D70JYy9K G/wPp4xu62CniHFBc8LC1T6csV0nKahmAHcaM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=EjVMBosazeyQRl0sENrwrnlM+ovQ2JiTLre8FStCMP+jgWS3Ve6V6TewFSSkKGq/YE rnillhDWyfpZwrVdz1aeMZhoDy2ZJ3xu5ki7b+KEriFufUU1qVRvQVa0ox/BvfzML1jv R/CuhadEFjD7qQD3fzidUgu+3ij7a8mFfDSkk= Original-Received: by 10.224.60.203 with SMTP id q11mr399856qah.245.1241544766130; Tue, 05 May 2009 10:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from SCARLETT.PSY.CMU.EDU (SCARLETT.PSY.CMU.EDU [128.2.249.106]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm290546qwj.21.2009.05.05.10.32.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 05 May 2009 10:32:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ab5rvds7.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110683 Archived-At: On May 5, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Chong Yidong wrote: > Could either your or David check in the nsterm.m fix, assuming no > other > problems turn up with it? I will test it for a day or two, but check it in soon. I still think there are other places where the same technique would be beneficial, but they would be outside of ns*.m, albeit in #ifdefs. From the sound of your messages, I take it we'll hold off on that. Getting back to Ian's original point: Overall, if we were to release now, I would consider the NS port "usable", but "experimental" rather than "stable".