From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: longlines-show-hard-newlines - should not the default be t? Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:28:00 +0200 Message-ID: <485E4550.1070707@gmail.com> References: <485DA2E7.3010207@gmail.com> <873an6l098.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <485E2345.8060605@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214137709 24698 80.91.229.12 (22 Jun 2008 12:28:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel , Miles Bader To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 22 14:29:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KAOgx-0005ZE-T7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:29:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53402 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAOg8-0007lG-JW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:28:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAOg3-0007kq-Op for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:28:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAOg1-0007kJ-W7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:28:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56166 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAOg1-0007kG-RJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:39008) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KAOfx-0000W3-BP; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:28:09 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-59.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.59]:63899 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KAOfv-000698-5p; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:28:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080621-0, 2008-06-21), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.145.59 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KAOfv-000698-5p. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KAOfv-000698-5p 1abd3c8a69a68a82c3d2507e02a73647 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99687 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > When using the display-wrapping code, we have some info in the fringes, > but to b honest, I'm not very satisfied with them either: they work > great when some lines are wrapped, but they're not so hot when most > lines are wrapped. > > In that case, I'd much prefer that instead of adding the curly arrows in > the fringe on 90% of the lines, we add a paragraph-icon in the fringe of > the few lines that do not wrap. But will it not be much harder to see to which line the fringe belongs?