From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: followup to bug report not included in bug tracker; diverseautomatic Subject lines; ACK noise Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:00:45 +0100 Message-ID: <485D6BFD.6020706@gnu.org> References: <001901c8d112$df848680$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <20080618192134.GA20708@rzlab.ucr.edu> <004301c8d3bd$e86238d0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214082084 5006 80.91.229.12 (21 Jun 2008 21:01:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Don Armstrong' , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 21 23:02:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KAADk-0004cO-GB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:02:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57912 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAACu-0004UA-VE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:01:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAACq-0004Tn-AG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:01:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAACm-0004SX-LQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:01:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48269 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAACm-0004SR-DK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:01:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.23]:16209) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KAACl-0006HP-UQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:01:04 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAFAEBvV0hTQxds/2dsb2JhbACBW60p X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,684,1204502400"; d="scan'208";a="134653268" X-IP-Direction: IN Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO wanchan.jasonrumney.net) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 21 Jun 2008 22:01:00 +0100 Original-Received: from [192.168.249.27] (chiko.jasonrumney.net [192.168.249.27]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476082EC; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:01:55 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) In-Reply-To: <004301c8d3bd$e86238d0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=8086879D X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99637 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: > Please put such metadata in the message body or other header fields. Mail clients don't know about those either, so how will they be preserved when someone replies? And then there is the Usenet gateway to worry about, which is what really forces us to stick with having the bug number prepended to the Subject line, as even the reply address is lost when someone replies via usenet.